Thursday, May 9, 2013

Self Reflection


            “You didn’t like my picture on Facebook!” I told my cousin one day, referencing a picture of my acceptance to an Italian University, feeling like she did not care about my accomplishment.  “Do you really care if I like your pictures?” she confusedly replied.  To her, Facebook is simply a communication tool.  I saw Facebook as just a communication tool too, or at least I thought I did.  Why did I care if she publicly liked my accomplishment when she already told me how she was proud of me in ‘real life’.  When did my self worth become tied into this profile?  My Facebook profile should be a superficial reflection of me at best, just enough that I can be recognized as myself when communicating with others.  Having this profile though, especially at a time where popular culture has amplified the appeal of and desire for physical beauty, has caused a change in my brain chemistry that makes me concern myself over how this superficial reflection makes me look.

            Reading the chapter on narcissism in Rosen’s iDisorder ‘Media Starts with “Me”, I had a shocking revelation.  I am a huge narcissist.  I already knew that I was mildly narcissistic, but I did not realize it was to this extent.  I scour my photos for the perfect profile picture.  I ‘untag’ myself in pictures where I do not look good.  I try to perfect this superficial reflection, this profile that others identify as me.  Why do I do this?  Is it because it’s easier to change my portrayal on the Internet than it is to change myself in real life?

            I’m still reflecting on this, but do y’all have any thoughts on the subject?  Do y’all find yourselves doing the same things?

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Every year, The Edge poses a question to 150 of the top minds in the world. This year's question was "What should we be worried about?" Recognized a few names in the list that were pretty interesting.. "That digital technologies are sapping our patience and changing our perception of time." –Nicholas G. Carr “I worry we have yet to have a conversation about what seems to be a developing 'new normal' about the presence of screens in the playroom and kindergarten” -Sherry Turkle

Friday, May 3, 2013

KTD- Kissing Transmission Device
Perhaps one of the most unique devices examined this semester, the Kissing Transmission Device is truly a feat of modern technology.  The simple, yet profound device, developed in the Kajimoto Laboratory in Tokyo, marks the introduction of the first new medium of communication since the cell phone.
With the ability to instantaneously talk to anyone around the world via phone or internet messaging, the only thing that had been missing from long distance communication, prior to this invention, was physical contact.  The purpose of the KTD is to fill that void.
The device is simple enough- just a small box with a small, slightly bent rod sticking out.  This rod acts as a "tongue" that is manipulated by the tongue of the user.  The movement of the rod is then transmitted to and replicated by another device, either simultaneously or after a period of time if the motion is recorded.
The practical application is fairly straightforward, couples in long distance relationships now at least have a semblance of contact with their partner.  The device could also be used by celebrities to send a message to their fans that would certainly be much more intimate than a "tweet", according to the device's creator.
The device isn't without downsides, however.  Anyone who has experienced a kiss can vouch for the fact that it isn't exactly the same as rotating a robotic rod with your tongue.  A much deeper problem lies in the device's "telos", which Sherry Turkle addresses in Alone Together.  She notes, "The blurring of intimacy and solitude may reach its starkest expression when a robot is proposed as a romantic partner."  Although there is another person operating the other end of the device, it does represent the steady disintegration of true, meaningful, human interaction.
What's next? Who knows, but it will be interesting (or depressing) to see.

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Race, Racism, and Representation

                Biologically, there is only one human race. All people belong to the genus and species Homo sapiens. The construct of differences based upon skin color is created an idea created by humans. Racism is a social and political hierarchy in which different divisions are placed above one another based upon observed trait. Historically, race and racism stem from one main event in the West’s history: Slavery and the slave trade.
 The beginning of racism can be traced back to the beginning of slavery. As soon as the economic advantages were realized, slavery was something that light-skinned people wanted to keep and protect because they were reaping the benefit. The idea that slaves were lower in the human hierarchy stems from the protection of slavery for economic gain. This view point allowed the sentiment to spread that slavery was acceptable because slaves were inferior to people who have lighter skin. Racism, however, did not end with slavery. The sentiment against people with darker skin lingered in the West becoming ingrained in society. People of lighter skin did not want to mix with the ‘inferior’ races due to a personal protection of their superiority. By the 1800’s, the human race had almost completely been split into the superior lighter-skinned people and the inferior darker-skinned people.
While slavery was the reason that racism is so widespread, sentiment was not changed when it was abolished. The ideas of superiority and hierarchy based upon skin did not go away. Laws have been created to stop blatant segregation between people due to race, religion, or culture, but that does not mean the end of racism, either. The fact remains that small forms of separation of races still linger today. Today, racism is defined as more of a separation of people of different skin colors and the judgment based upon stereotypes. Just as literature was influenced in the years after slavery to continue a form of this segregation, technology today is still slightly influenced its movement to a small degree. Today, most technology that is geared to a certain race is created to please a stereotype.
While the technology itself does not necessarily prefer one race to another, the marketing and advertisement of the technology does show a preference. Many different technologies that aid in a healthy lifestyle will advertise themselves to white, younger women. This demographic then feel that the technologies is made for them and they tend to buy it more. Other products like the Beats headphones market itself to black people who are in their teens and early adulthood. The advertisements pick a demographic to advertise to so that they have the best chance of making a profit. The advertisement may, however, be indirectly suggesting a certain class of people to buy a technology by using a certain race in the advertisements. Statistics state that more white families are of a higher financial class than black families. Therefore, an apple product would use a white model to advertise a new, expensive technology. This is not meant to necessarily target a race, but instead uses race as a means to entice a social class.
Racism is still present in today’s society. In the interviews, most people said that they do still see racism around them. Not as many people, however, saw racism as a trend in the creation of technologies. Instead, they suggested that the technologies like Facebook provided a means of racism occurring in society, especially anonymously. So, while race and racism are not factors that mold the creation of new technologies, it does still affect the technologies in society today. 

take a year off from the internet

What happens to your life when you take a year off from the internet?  This man did just that and wrote about it.  Check it out:

http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/1/4279674/im-still-here-back-online-after-a-year-without-the-internet

TechShop: An Inventor's Paradise in San Francisco