INTRODUCTION (Jared):
Twitter is a community of
microbloggers. It is a social networking site centered around something known
as a tweet. A tweet is a post that must contain less than 140 characters, and
can include links to pictures, videos, or other websites. A tweet usually is a
statement of what you are doing, or can be a thought, idea, concept, picture,
video, news, or topics of interest. Another important part of Twitter is the
concept of trending topics. Trending topics are key phrases or words that can
be searched and monitored by the Twitter community, and these usually are seen
with the pound sign or hash in front of the words with no spaces in between
them. Also, using Twitter, you can follow someone, but they do not have to
follow you back, which is different from many social networking sites. This
allows for the extensive following of celebrities, without celebrities having
to follow all of their fans back. You can also private message people who you
follow, tag people in your posts, and retweet posts (posting someone else's
tweet for all of your followers to see). Twitter is one of the most visited
websites in the world, and is a very successful social networking site.
POSITIVES
(Tyler):
Twitter is a level playing field;
anyone can communicate with anyone. For
instance, I could follow a sports star and he or she could follow me. This opens up the flow of ideas, allowing
people to obtain many different angles and opinions in order to create a
complete idea. As a result, we are more
connected to the world and people around us.
Due to this expanded channel of
communication, we need a valve to limit what we are exposed to, and Twitter
provides this control. Its character
limit constrains the size of each message, while each user has the ability to “follow”
or “block” other users to define the number of messages that one sees. Unlike other social media websites, Twitter does not obligate a user to follow another user if a connection is established by the latter.
Ultimately, I view Twitter as a flat
plane in which communication occurs. We
are all easily connected in this plane, with no user having an advantage over
another. In Proust and the Squid, Maryanne Wolf states:
We are only at the beginning of analyzing the cognitive implications of using, for instance, the browser “back” button, URL syntax, … and “pedagogical tags” for enhancing comprehension and memory. These tools have extremely promising implications for the intellectual development of the users, particularly users with discrete areas of weakness…. (Wolf 220)
For
those individuals who have social impurities and struggle with communication,
Twitter offers an encouraging medium in which they can connect with
others. These individuals are brought
into the plane that is Twitter, while the mental implications of Twitter
improve and raise the community as a whole.
As a society with increased mental and social skills, we will create
stronger, deeper connections with one another.
NEGATIVES
(Josh):
In Alone Together, Turkle writes, “on social networking sites such as
Facebook, we think we will be presenting ourselves, but our profile ends up as
somebody else – often the fantasy of who we want to be. Distinctions blur” (153). This implies that the use of social
networking sites, like Twitter, can make the presentation of ourselves more
difficult and confusing. People present
themselves in every form of communication, but I think that Turkle is implying
here that social networks can make the process of the exploration of identity
even more confusing.
She goes on to write, “Virtual
places offer connection with uncertain claims to commitment. We don’t count on cyberfriends to come by if
we are ill, to celebrate our children’s successes, or help us mourn the death
of our parents. People know this, and
yet the emotional charge on cyberspace is high” (153). This applies specifically to Twitter, because
of the way that any Twitter user can follow any other Twitter user without
being followed in return. Twitter truly offers connection without commitment,
and this may lead to confusing attitudes towards connection, commitment, and
community in general.
Finally, Turkle discusses the
compulsion that people develop to constantly use the Internet. She describes a woman in her seventies who
has meditated on a biblical reading every morning for years. Recently, however, this woman has found it
difficult to resist the urge to check her e-mail before her spiritual
practices. In fact, her compulsion has
become so strong that her resistance to checking her e-mail has become part of
her spiritual devotion. While this example deals with e-mail, similar
compulsions certainly exist in Twitter users.
It is likely that regular Twitter users will grow strong desires to
always stay updated, and will develop a habit of checking their accounts often. This could be harmful because of the
information that is supplied by Twitter, which is more often than not
trivial. Basically, a Twitter account
can grow to be a waste of time.
While I don't have a twitter account and am not well versed on the subject, i think it is important to note that Rosen takes a stance quite opposite to Turkle on the subject. He claims that it is a part of being in the latest generation, to have one's identity intertwined with one's cyber identity, and create relationships that , to them, are very meaningful even though they can't come around physically as Turkle points out. He also takes note that the iGeneration is the one that seeks out the most positive reinforcement, a driving force in Turkle's "emotional charge". Perhaps our generation, the net Generation, is simply not meant to understand twitter.
ReplyDeleteIn "The Shallows," Nicholas Carr stated that: "The tight bonds we form with our tools go both ways. Even as our technologies become extensions of ourselves, we become extensions of our technologies."
ReplyDeleteI can see Twitter as a convenient tool to connect with other people and keep up with what's going on, but some people can develop a compulsion to be on Twitter all the time. If they're not on Twitter sharing or getting information, they feel like they're missing out, they feel "incomplete."
While I think social networking sites, such as twitter, are a great way to connect with the world in order to create a more unified ONLINE community, as opposed to the traditional community model, I do not think Twitter is a good way of doing so. There are several issues with it:
ReplyDelete1. You do not create MUTUAL bonds. Instead of created friendships, the masses simply act as followers who are not communicating inter-personally
2. Twitter encourages users to "tweet" about their lives on a near constant basis. Inane thoughts and activities bombard the feed, simultaneously making your tweets less important while making you feel MORE important. This article (http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/10/its-not-just-you-71-percent-of-tweets-are-ignored/) shows that most things said on twitter are completely IGNORED by everyone else in the network. This does not a community make.
I have the same thoughts on Twitter as I do on Facebook. In Turkle’s Alone Together, she discusses the anxiety that comes with connectivity (pg. 242). Turkle talked to a few students from Silver Academy about Facebook and technology. One student claimed she was afraid to “miss something” and that she couldn’t put down her phone. That “’it has a camera. It has the time. I can always be with my friends. Not having your phone is a high level of stress.’” Another student claimed that “’Technology is bad because people are not as strong as its pull.’” This is the problem that I see in Twitter. The advocates of the technology imply that what is posted to Twitter is up to the minute and detailed, and therefore important. But the problem here is that we sometimes forget the link between important topics and the amount of information we make widespread. Ideally, an important situation should be covered and extensively talked about, up to the minute and aas detailed as possible. The reverse is not true. Something should not be deemed important simply because it's up to the minute and very detailed.
ReplyDeleteI think Twitter beats Facebook as a communication tool because it focuses more on the communicating and less on projecting identity, which is what Facebook does. You can communicate with others on Twitter just like you do on Facebook, but without all the "profile stalking" issues. On Twitter, you have a username and a small statement about yourself and that's it. I think it's safer, it's funner, and you worry less about how the social network world views you, so there is more room for self expression.
ReplyDeleteI like Josh's use of Alone Together, especially the concept of having the compulsion to always be on the internet. With Twitter specifically, this is evident as people will tweet so frequently that they are essentially on Twitter all hours that they are awake. They tweet every action they do (e.g. going out to eat, going to the movies, going to the shower, etc) that it becomes unnecessary and even unsafe as the public will be able to monitor your lifestyle leading to possible scenarios such as robbers now knowing when you are not at home.
ReplyDeleteTwitter offers a steady stream of information that can be enlightening, stultifying, or neutral. The most controversial aspect is the steady stream of bites of information, regardless of the content. Nick Carr studied the effects of this on people's thinking and argued that, because it does not allow for slow, thoughtful concentration, it can actually prohibit the formation of complex and detailed thought. Twitter allows us to have a broad map of far-ranging bits of knowledge. However, it does not allow us to develop deep and detailed understandings.
ReplyDelete